FEATURED JOBS
A quick comment on Newt Gingrich’s rise in GOP presidential sweepstakes: I interviewed him several times while editor of the Atlanta Jewish Times in the 90s and in early 1995 wrote a 4,000 word cover story on him.
He is deeply paradoxical: He has a truly flawed ethical past regarding his marriages, had a number of close Jewish supporters, a highly respected intellect, fantastic speaking skills, a remarkable grasp of complicated issues and a strong Likud orientation on Israel. He also is a ruthless politician with remarkable focus.
In short, it was hard to argue with Newt because he knew so much. Rather, it was best to listen then go home and think about it—a luxury of time that politics does not often allow.
On Israel he was a center-right and not hard right. In other words, he was willing to engage in the possible. He would not think of tolerating anti-Semitism. He spoke in front of several Jewish groups—including a Conservative synagogue (Etz Chaim—across the street from his district office) and to the Haredi Orthodox Torah Day School.
I once asked him, “You describe yourself as a man of faith. How would you describe your faith?”
His response: “Total.”
Me: “Can you explain that a little?
Him: “Total.”
In other words, that’s my answer and that’s all you’re going to get. Sharp indeed.
A huge question is whether Newt could work with Democrats on anything. The architect of the 1994 Contract With America (jokingly referred to by Democrats as Contract On America) is not one known for compromise from stated positions.
Personally, I do not think Newt will overcome his personal past and become the nominee (but who knows?). I do know that when it comes to intellect, he is hands down the brightest GOPer in the race.
Comments (5)